Screening uptake rates and the clinical and cost effectiveness of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in primary versus secondary care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Authors
O Dea, AngelaInfanti, Jennifer J
Gillespie, Paddy
Tummon, Olga
Fanous, Samuel
Glynn, Liam G
McGuire, Brian E
Newell, John
Dunne, Fidelma P
Affiliation
National University of Ireland GalwayIssue Date
2014-01-17Keywords
DIABETES MELLITUSPREGNANCY
PRIMARY CARE
SECONDARY AND TERTIARY SERVICES
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Screening uptake rates and the clinical and cost effectiveness of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in primary versus secondary care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. 2014, 15 (1):27 TrialsPublisher
BioMed CentralJournal
TrialsDOI
10.1186/1745-6215-15-27PubMed ID
24438478Additional Links
http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/pdf/1745-6215-15-27.pdfAbstract
The risks associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are well recognized, and there is increasing evidence to support treatment of the condition. However, clear guidance on the ideal approach to screening for GDM is lacking. Professional groups continue to debate whether selective screening (based on risk factors) or universal screening is the most appropriate approach. Additionally, there is ongoing debate about what levels of glucose abnormalities during pregnancy respond best to treatment and which maternal and neonatal outcomes benefit most from treatment. Furthermore, the implications of possible screening options on health care costs are not well established. In response to this uncertainty there have been repeated calls for well-designed, randomised trials to determine the efficacy of screening, diagnosis, and management plans for GDM. We describe a randomised controlled trial to investigate screening uptake rates and the clinical and cost effectiveness of screening in primary versus secondary care settings. The objective of this study is to assess screening uptake rates, and the clinical and cost effectiveness of screening for GDM in primary versus secondary care.This is will be an unblinded, two-group, parallel randomised controlled trial (RCT). The target population includes 784 women presenting for their first antenatal visit at 12 to 18 weeks gestation at two hospitals in the west of Ireland: Galway University Hospital and Mayo General Hospital. Participants will be offered universal screening for GDM at 24 to 28 weeks gestation in either primary care (n = 392) or secondary care (n = 392) locations. The primary outcome variable is the uptake rate of screening. Secondary outcomes include indicators of clinical effectiveness of screening at each screening site (primary and secondary) including gestational week at time of screening, time to access antenatal diabetes services for women diagnosed with GDM, and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes for women with GDM. In addition, parallel economic and qualitative evaluations will be conducted. The trial will cover the period from the woman's first hospital antenatal visit at 12 to 18 weeks gestation, until the completion of the pregnancy.Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN02232125.
Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1745-6215ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/1745-6215-15-27